michaela-damm.jpg
blocshop
March 04, 2021
0 min read

Time and materials vs fixed-price: Comparison of pricing models

Time and materials vs fixed-price: Comparison of pricing models.png

How do time and materials and fixed-price contracts work?

When we outsource a software development project, we need to know which billing agreement will best meet our needs. We have the choice between two major types of billing agreements: Time and materials and fixed-price. Each model offers distinct advantages and disadvantages. Let’s take a closer look at these two models:

First up, fixed-price agreements. Software product owners like fixed-price agreements for projects that:

  • Have a small scope

  • Have easy-to-understand requirements

  • Have a short time horizon

  • Have no need for flexibility or expansion

Fixed-price agreements don’t work so well for projects with a vague scope. They also work less well for longer-term projects. Fixed-price agreements also function less well for very large projects. Trying to  predict the scope of such an undertaking proves very difficult.

Now let’s take a look at time and materials contracts. Product owners must choose a time and materials model contract when:

  • They do not know the full requirements 

  • They do not know the full scope of the project

  • They want flexibility to make changes

  • The project is large

  • The requirements might change during development

Time and materials contracts worry some product owners. The product owner may fear fluctuation in budgets and payments. They might also worry about projects taking too long to complete. Software development teams can address both of these concerns. They do this through open communication and transparency. Developers must discuss the time frame and budget with clients. This way, nobody fears massive budget overlays. Product owners don’t worry about projects costing much more than anticipated. Most time and materials contracts cost less and deliver faster than fixed-price contracts.

So, what are the advantages and disadvantages of fixed-price versus time and materials outsourcing agreements?

Fixed-price model advantages

When companies choose to use the fixed price model, they know exactly what they will pay. For projects with a short time frame and predictable steps, fixed-price makes sense. Software development teams create easy-to-understand budgets and schedules.  Product owners choose fixed-price contracts for their predictability and simplicity. They know exactly what to pay and when to pay for it.

Fixed-price model disadvantages

Fixed-price billing sometimes proves disadvantageous for both product owners and software development teams. The development team must keep strict to requirements and stop any scope creep. They must review the expected product and make a meticulous plan for the project.  Poor planning leads to budget and time over-runs, which will hurt profits. If a team underbids a fixed-price project, they cannot ask for a larger budget.

Product owners who choose the fixed-price model have less control over the project. They must also accept less ability for change and flexibility. Companies offering a fixed-price model might over-or under-bid. 

Development teams using fixed-price contracts must do a lot of research ahead of time. Teams must explore every aspect of the upcoming project to offer an accurate price. This takes up valuable development time.

Time and materials model advantages

Time and materials billing agreements usually prove very beneficial. The client and the software development team both benefit. Flexibility is the biggest benefit of time and materials model agreements. Software development teams have the power to change requirements and adjust features. They can make changes based on user testing and feedback. Project owners feel free to ask for more features or changes to existing features. Time and materials contracts work well when the software development team uses agile methodologies. Teams using agile value transparency and open communication. They estimate the costs of each sprint. They communicate with product owners. Product owners know how much each sprint will cost. Agile and time and materials contracts work in perfect symbiosis.

Time and materials model disadvantages

Some product owners may worry about cost overruns or out-of-control budgets. To mitigate this fear, software development partners give clients a rough estimate of the total cost of the project. Product owners must be more involved in a time and materials contract than in fixed-price contracts.

Think of the differences between the two models like a home improvement project. If you need a faucet replace in your kitchen, a fixed-price contact makes sense. There are few variables and the project is short-term.  But what if you need to do a full remodel of the whole house? You face many variables and possible changes. This makes the project very difficult to estimate. A company bidding for such a project with a fixed-price contract is in a tough spot. They will either inflate prices to protect profits or risk underbidding. Neither situation is ideal; for the customer or the service provider.


Software costs vary by project and business requirements. We at Blocshop understand that you might need some rough estimates before a project begins. A typical project at Blocshop takes three months and costs about $60,000. More complex projects will take more time and more resources, costing up to $300,000. Blocshop always delivers an MVP (Minimum viable product) early. This gives clients a starting point from which they can budget for future software development.  Clients can make informed decisions about what features they want to add without spending money on features they do not need. Tell us more about the type of application you need and your specifications, and we’ll get back to you with a project estimate.


Learn more from our insights

roro665_Best_Practices_for_Integrating_AI_in_Fintech_Projects_76570294-b2df-4e1d-a775-bdc646351d08_1 (1).png
October 16, 2024

Best practices for integrating AI in fintech projects

Discover 8 key steps for AI implementation in fintech and open banking with a focus on compliance, data quality, bias, and ethics.

roro665_Extract_Transform_Load_process_for_data_that_is_power_8734b36d-5737-4fdb-904e-ea6bca40c51b_3.png
October 09, 2024

Real-life examples of generative AI products and applications

See real-life examples of generative AI products and applications developed by Blocshop that impact industries from retail to fintech.

roro665_data_transformation_from_one_format_to_another_with_g_91332f66-93b0-48d8-9d5e-a8609529cbb7_3.png
September 25, 2024

Generative AI-powered ETL: A Fresh Approach to Data Integration and Analytics

ETL meets generative AI. See how AI-powered ETL redefines data integration and brings more flexible data processing and analytics across industries.

roro665_uk_pensions_dashboard_reform_magazine_cover_collage_-_1888e056-80f6-4aac-958c-bf02b128a7d3_1.png
September 03, 2024

UK Pensions Dashboard Compliance: Deadlines, Transition Steps, and the Use of AI-driven Data Mapping

How AI-driven data mapping can support UK Pensions Dashboard compliance. Understand key deadlines and steps for efficient data conversion and transition to the UK Pensions Dashboard.

roro665_a_cover_image_depicting_data_conversions_and_compliance_c8ddf35a-cc0f-447a-abb7-0f4b1f14bb64 (1).png
August 23, 2024

Using AI for data conversion and compliance in the banking sector

Discover how AI transforms data conversion and compliance in the banking industry, optimizing processes while managing risks.

ai_applications_in_banking_and_banking_technology_blocshop.png
August 14, 2024

AI Applications in Banking: Real-World Examples

Explore how major banks are using AI to enhance customer service, detect fraud, and optimize operations, with insights into technical implementations.

20221116_153941.jpg
July 31, 2024

From Concept to MVP in Just 12 Weeks with Blocshop

Blocshop delivers your MVP in 12 weeks, solving real pain points with agile sprints, daily scrum meetings, and fortnightly reviews. Here's the process explained.

chatgpt4_ai_integration_blocshop-transformed.png
July 19, 2024

ChatGPT-4: An Overview, Capabilities, and Limitations

The technical aspects, usage scenarios, and limitations of ChatGPT-4, including a comparison with ChatGPT-4o.

roro665_depict_a_data_sample_thta_completely_changes_its_form_725a4f20-ea40-4dd1-a68d-5c4327c9bf24_1.png
June 20, 2024

Generative AI used for data conversions and reformatting

How to use generative AI for data conversion, addressing integrity, hallucinations, privacy, and compliance issues with effective validation and monitoring strategies.

DALL·E 2024-05-30 09.37.01 - An illustration suitable for an article about ISO 20022. The scene should feature a modern, sleek representation of the ISO 20022 logo in the center. .webp
May 28, 2024

ISO 20022 Explained: A Comprehensive Guide for Financial Institution Managers

What is ISO 20022? How does it affect companies and institutions in the fintech and banking industry and how to prepare for its adoption? All explained in this article.

DALL·E 2024-05-22 20.55.08 - A detailed and high-quality DSLR photo of a person using a laptop to shop online, showing personalized product recommendations on the screen. The back.webp
May 16, 2024

Key AI Trends in E-commerce and Overview of AI integrations for E-commerce Platforms in 2024

Transform your e-commerce platform with AI tools for personalization, analytics, chatbots, search, and fraud detection. Boost sales and improve customer experiences.

eIDAS mark.png
May 09, 2024

Digital Identity and Payment Services in the EU in 2024: Key Updates

eIDAS 2.0 and PSD3 are set to enhance how digital identities and payment services are managed across the European Union in 2024. Here’s an overview of how each framework contributes to the digital landscape of the EU, what to expect, and how to prepare.

eIDAS 2 in fintech and open banking EU market.png
May 06, 2024

What is eIDAS 2.0 and EU Digital Identity Wallet and how will it change the EU digital market

Learn how eIDAS 2.0 and the EU Digital Identity Wallet will transform digital transactions and identity management across the European Union.

best large language models for ERP systems.png
March 31, 2024

Language Models Best Suited for Integration into ERPs

Four prominent large language models stand out for their compatibility and effectiveness in ERP system processes and automation. See what they are.

PSD3 in open banking Blocshop.png
April 23, 2024

PSD2 vs. PSD3: The Evolution of Payment Services Regulation

What is PSD3 in open banking? See how PSD3 compares to PSD2 and what should banks and fintech businesses do to ensure regulatory compliance in the EU market.

roro665_hands_working_with_a_laptop_in_a_modern_office_there_is_20dca307-c993-4539-99d7-fd5ca264248c.png
April 14, 2024

Enhancing ERP Systems with AI Chatbots

Explore how AI chatbots can transform ERP systems, enhancing efficiency, decision-making, and user interaction.

eIDAS in fintech and open banking EU market.png
April 29, 2024

eIDAS: The regulation helping secure Europe's digital future

See how eIDAS enhances EU digital transactions with secure identity verification, supporting e-commerce and public services across Europe.

hybrid ERPs.png
March 21, 2024

Hybrid ERP: An Innovative Approach to Enterprise Resource Planning

Hybrid ERP is a blend of cloud and on-premise solutions. With expertise in both, Blocshop is uniquely positioned to help you with hybrid ERP development and implementation.

0-4 cover.png
October 03, 2023

IT Staffing: Individual Hiring vs. Specialized Developer Teams

Should you hire individual developers or go for a specialized, custom-built developer team?

chatgpt-35-limitations.jpg
July 17, 2023

ChatGPT-3.5: An Overview and Limitations

In this article, we'll take a closer look at the capabilities and limitations of ChatGPT-3.5, providing you with a comprehensive overview of what it can do and what its boundaries are. So, let's delve into the inner workings of this large language model.